Love him or hate him, Justin Bieber is undeniably one of the most popular musicians on the charts. He’s had multiple number one hits, and he’s sold out stadiums from coast to coast. However, one of his most popular songs is now being called into question.
Indie pop singer Casey Dienel, also known as White Hinterland, has accused Bieber of stealing a vocal rift from her song Ring the Bell and using it without a license for his hit song Sorry. Dienel took to social media to explain her reasoning.
“After the release of ‘Sorry,’ my lawyers sent Bieber a letter regarding the infringement, but Bieber’s team again chose to ignore me. I offered Bieber’s team an opportunity to have a private dialogue about the infringement, but they refused to even acknowledge my claim, despite the obviousness of the sample.”
Now Dienel is suing for copyright infringement, seeking an undisclosed amount in damages for legal fees and lost profits. The suit also seeks to prevent any future infringements.
Bieber and co-producer DJ Skrillex have adamantly denied the infringement. They also used social media to explain their position.
— SKRILLEX (@Skrillex) May 27, 2016
These kinds of cases are hard to predict. Plenty of other musicians have been sued for the same thing and lost in court. In order to prove infringement, Dienel’s legal team will have to prove two things: access and similarity.
Access simply means that Bieber has access to Ring the Bell, and could have heard it prior to production of his song. Ring the Bell was released publicly in 2014, and Sorry was released in 2015, so this should be pretty easy. Similarity is much harder to prove. The two songs must be similar in musical components in order for Dienel to win. The language of this law is a bit vague and leaves room for interpretation.
"Our company has worked with a number of patent attorneys and were so pleased when we began working with Parsons & Goltry nearly a decade ago. Mike Goltry's knowledge and attention to detail has enabled us to have numerous products patented and trademarks registered. We highly recommend this Law Firm."
"Michael Goltry is the most professional, honest and effective patent attorney whom I ever met in my 40 year professional engineering career. I started to work with him over 20 years ago and plan to work indefinitely."
"Mr. Goltry took a provisional patent that we'd filed ourselves, and quickly and professionally turned our innovation into U.S. and foreign applications. His [patent claims] were a thing of beauty, and I was amazed by how deftly he countered the inevitable office actions. His language held up, and the U.S. Patent just issued. He was easy and efficient to work with, and his fees were remarkably reasonable. We're not planning to go anywhere else, ever."
"I applied for a patent through Parsons & Goltry. After being on the docket for 2 years at the USPTO, I received notification that my patent request had been denied. Michael Goltry contacted me immediately to review my options. After I informed him of my decision to move forward, he filed a response to the USPTO. In his response he got the examiner to fully understand the claims in the patent application and the "denied" decision was reversed. I was able to secure and receive a "patent granted" decision. Thank you, Michael Goltry."
10643 North Frank Lloyd
Wright Blvd. Suite 201
Scottsdale, AZ 85259
Phone: (480) 991-3435
Our office is located in Scottsdale, Arizona, but we service clients throughout the United States and Internationally.