by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; firstname.lastname@example.org)
Above and to the left is a fishing lure 42 configured with an adjustable fin assembly 74, shown to the right by itself. The lure 42 has a body 46 configured with hooks 54, an eyelet 56 configured to secure a fishing line 59, and fins 62 and 63 outboard of either side of the body 46. The adjustable fin assembly 74 includes first and second members 76 and 85 mounted rotatably to the body 46 through corresponding openings formed in the body 46. The first member supports the fins 62 and 63 and an extension 80. The fins 62 and 64 pitch relative to body 46 when the first member 76 rotates. The second member 85 and the extension 80 of the first member 76 interact in a cavity within the body 46, wherein rotation of the second member 85 imparts rotation to the first member 76. The interaction between the second member 85 and the extension 80 of the first member 76 within the cavity disables the interacting structure from influencing the lure’s flight characteristics through the water. In the example above, rotation of the second member 85 causes it to reciprocate in opposition to the extension 80.
The Ethos of a Patent Claim Drafter: Focus on a novelty, the new over the old, field-specific context, and only as much old as required to support the new.
Let us assume a point of novelty of this lure is the interaction between the first member and the second member within the cavity, and the patent specification discloses other examples of operative couplings within the cavity between the adjustable first and second members. Below is an example of just three independent claims to this lure. The product of the claims is a lure, something configured to attract, entice, or allure.
1. A fishing lure, comprising:
2. A fishing lure, comprising:
3. A fishing lure, comprising:
"Our company has worked with a number of patent attorneys and were so pleased when we began working with Parsons & Goltry nearly a decade ago. Mike Goltry's knowledge and attention to detail has enabled us to have numerous products patented and trademarks registered. We highly recommend this Law Firm."
"Michael Goltry is the most professional, honest and effective patent attorney whom I ever met in my 40 year professional engineering career. I started to work with him over 20 years ago and plan to work indefinitely."
"Mr. Goltry took a provisional patent that we'd filed ourselves, and quickly and professionally turned our innovation into U.S. and foreign applications. His [patent claims] were a thing of beauty, and I was amazed by how deftly he countered the inevitable office actions. His language held up, and the U.S. Patent just issued. He was easy and efficient to work with, and his fees were remarkably reasonable. We're not planning to go anywhere else, ever."
"I applied for a patent through Parsons & Goltry. After being on the docket for 2 years at the USPTO, I received notification that my patent request had been denied. Michael Goltry contacted me immediately to review my options. After I informed him of my decision to move forward, he filed a response to the USPTO. In his response he got the examiner to fully understand the claims in the patent application and the "denied" decision was reversed. I was able to secure and receive a "patent granted" decision. Thank you, Michael Goltry."
10643 North Frank Lloyd
Wright Blvd. Suite 201
Scottsdale, AZ 85259
Phone: (480) 991-3435
Phoenix’s premiere patent attorneys serving clients throughout the US and internationally for over 20 years.
Our office is located in Scottsdale, Arizona, but we service clients throughout the United States and Internationally.