Trademark Archives - Page 4 of 5

Federal Circuit Refuses to Defer to 2019 USPTO Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance – Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics LLC (Fed. Cir 2019) (nonprecedential)

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) On January 7, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued is 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance (2019 PEG). The 2019 PEG revises the USPTO’s procedures to determine whether a claim is directed to a judicial exception to patent eligible subject matter. The intention… See the Full Article

Category:Patents , Trademark

The Drawing Requirement for a U.S. Trademark Application

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) A U.S. trademark application must include a drawing of the mark sought to be registered. The drawing must be clear, and must be filed with the original application to receive a filing date. The purpose of the drawing is to provide notice of the mark sought to… See the Full Article

Category:Trademark

Marks Which Can Be Registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Trademark: any word, name, symbol, figure, letter, or device, or any combination, used, or intended to be used, in commerce to identify and distinguish the goods of one manufacturer or seller from goods manufactured or sold by others, and to indicate the source of the goods. In short, a trademark is a brand name. Service… See the Full Article

Category:Trademark

TRADEMARKS

Trademarks are used to distinguish the goods of one party from the goods of another. Service Marks distinguish the services of one provider from the services of another provider. Trademarks and service marks are treated equally under law and commonly referred to as marks. On 25 October 1870, Trademark Number 1 was registered to the… See the Full Article

Category:Trademark

Previous Posts More Posts

Client Approved

“”

"Our company has worked with a number of patent attorneys and were so pleased when we began working with Parsons & Goltry nearly a decade ago. Mike Goltry's knowledge and attention to detail has enabled us to have numerous products patented and trademarks registered. We highly recommend this Law Firm."

- Sharon K.

“”

"Michael Goltry is the most professional, honest and effective patent attorney whom I ever met in my 40 year professional engineering career. I started to work with him over 20 years ago and plan to work indefinitely."

- Zoltan Kemeny, PhD, Struct. Eng.

“”

"Mr. Goltry took a provisional patent that we'd filed ourselves, and quickly and professionally turned our innovation into U.S. and foreign applications. His [patent claims] were a thing of beauty, and I was amazed by how deftly he countered the inevitable office actions. His language held up, and the U.S. Patent just issued. He was easy and efficient to work with, and his fees were remarkably reasonable. We're not planning to go anywhere else, ever."

- Ski Milburn, CEO, Victori, LLC

“”

"I applied for a patent through Parsons & Goltry. After being on the docket for 2 years at the USPTO, I received notification that my patent request had been denied. Michael Goltry contacted me immediately to review my options. After I informed him of my decision to move forward, he filed a response to the USPTO. In his response he got the examiner to fully understand the claims in the patent application and the "denied" decision was reversed. I was able to secure and receive a "patent granted" decision. Thank you, Michael Goltry."

- Kathy H., Inventor