Blog | Parsons & Goltry | Patent Law Blog

Obviousness Based on the Rational of Mere “Design Choice”

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) One question facing inventors is whether their invention is patentable in view of what is known in the prior art, namely, all information that has been made available to the public in any form before a given date that might be relevant to the originality of an… Read more

Category: Patents

What is a Patent Application?

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) What is a patent application? It’s just a request for a grant of a patent described in a specification and claimed by a set of one or more claims that define, in technical terms, the scope of sought protection. The more patent applications I write, the less… Read more

Category: Patents

Federal Circuit Refuses to Defer to 2019 USPTO Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance – Cleveland Clinic Found. v. True Health Diagnostics LLC (Fed. Cir 2019) (nonprecedential)

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) On January 7, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued is 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance (2019 PEG). The 2019 PEG revises the USPTO’s procedures to determine whether a claim is directed to a judicial exception to patent eligible subject matter. The intention… Read more

Category: Patents , Trademark

The Provisional Application for Patent

by Michael Goltry, Registered Patent Attorney (480-991-3537; mg@pgpct.com) Since 1995, the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“Office”) has offered inventors the option of filing a provisional application for patent which was designed to provide a lower cost first patent filing in the United States. A provisional application provides the means to establish an early… Read more

Category: Patents

Client Approved

“”

"Our company has worked with a number of patent attorneys and were so pleased when we began working with Parsons & Goltry nearly a decade ago. Mike Goltry's knowledge and attention to detail has enabled us to have numerous products patented and trademarks registered. We highly recommend this Law Firm."

- Sharon K.

“”

"Michael Goltry is the most professional, honest and effective patent attorney whom I ever met in my 40 year professional engineering career. I started to work with him over 20 years ago and plan to work indefinitely."

- Zoltan Kemeny, PhD, Struct. Eng.

“”

"Mr. Goltry took a provisional patent that we'd filed ourselves, and quickly and professionally turned our innovation into U.S. and foreign applications. His [patent claims] were a thing of beauty, and I was amazed by how deftly he countered the inevitable office actions. His language held up, and the U.S. Patent just issued. He was easy and efficient to work with, and his fees were remarkably reasonable. We're not planning to go anywhere else, ever."

- Ski Milburn, CEO, Victori, LLC

“”

"I applied for a patent through Parsons & Goltry. After being on the docket for 2 years at the USPTO, I received notification that my patent request had been denied. Michael Goltry contacted me immediately to review my options. After I informed him of my decision to move forward, he filed a response to the USPTO. In his response he got the examiner to fully understand the claims in the patent application and the "denied" decision was reversed. I was able to secure and receive a "patent granted" decision. Thank you, Michael Goltry."

- Kathy H., Inventor